|
|
| Product |
Catalog # |
|
Narcotrace™ 6 Panel for the Forensic Identification of AMP,OPI, MET/MDMA, THC, COC, and FEN (10 test/kit)
|
11222-06-10 |
|
Narcotrace™ 6 Panel for the Forensic Identification of AMP,OPI, MET/MDMA, THC, COC, and FEN (25 test/kit)
|
11222-06-25 |
|
Narcotrace™ 8 Panel for the Forensic Identification of AMP,OPI, MET/MDMA, THC, COC, FEN, BZO and KET (10 test/kit)
|
11222-08-10 |
|
Narcotrace™ 8 Panel for the Forensic Identification of AMP,OPI, MET/MDMA, THC, COC, FEN, BZO and KET (25 test/kit))
|
11222-08-25 |
|
-
Use with Saliva, Sweat, Surface or Powder
-
Results Within Minutes
-
Lowest SampleVolume Required
-
No Extraction Step on Your Part
-
No Additional Equipment Required
-
Individual Test Results For Each Drug Detected
-
Built-in Quality Control
-
Tamper Proof, Adulteration Proof
-
Simple to Use and Understand
-
Non Invasive, Hygienic, Unintimidating
-
Use in Lab, Point of incident or in Random Drug Test
-
For Law Enforcement Use Only. Not For Diagnostic Use
|
Request More
Product Information
Partial List of References
- Curt E. Harper PhD, Dani C. Mata MS, Dayong Lee PhD. The impact of fentanyl on DUIDs and traffic fatalities: Blood and oral fluid data.
- Manuela Alcañiz, Montserrat Guillen, Miguel Santolino. Prevalence of drug use among drivers based on mandatory, random tests in a roadside survey
- European Monitoring Center For Drugs and Drug Addiction. Driving Under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines in Europe — findings from the DRUID project
- Christine Moore, Bill Lindsey, Curt E. Harper, Jennifer Knudsen. Use of Oral Fluid to Detect Drugged Drivers : A Toolkit
- Oral Fluid Sub Committee DUID SOFT-AAFS.Frequently Asked Questions
- SOFT/AAFS Oral Fluid Committee. Oral Fluid Drug Testing Pilot Project Guidelines For DUI/D Investigations
- Allison Veitenheimer, Jarrad Wagner. Evaluation of Oral Fluid as a Specimen for DUID
- V Vindenes, B Yttredal, E L Oiestad, H Waal, J P Bernard, J G Mørland, A Christophersen. Oral fluid is a viable alternative for monitoring drug abuse: detection of drugs in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and comparison to the results from urine samples from patients treated with Methadone or Buprenorphine
- Gus Burns. Positive roadside drug tests wrong nearly 24% of the time in Michigan pilot, data shows..
- B. Logan, Amanda L A Mohr, Stephen K. Talpins. Detection and prevalence of drug use in arrested drivers using the Dräger Drug Test 5000 and AffinitonDrugWipe oral fluid drug screening devices
- Michel Willekens. Center Report Belgium
- M. Asbridge, R.Ogilvie. A Feasibility Study of Roadside Oral Fluid Drug Testing.
- Sabina Strano-Rossi, Erika Castrignanò, Luca Anzillotti, Giovanni Serpelloni, Roberto Mollica, Franco Tagliaro, Jennifer P Pascali,Delfina di Stefano, Roberto Sgalla, Marcello Chiarotti. Evaluation of four oral fluid devices (DDS®, Drugtest 5000®, Drugwipe 5+® and RapidSTAT®) for on-site monitoring drugged driving in comparison with UHPLC-MS/MS analysis
- Roadside Drug Test Innocence Alliance. The Problem
- Alana Mazzoni.Banned for being sober: How roadside drug driving tests are WRONG up to 16% of the time - and innocent drivers could be losing their licence.s
- Ryan Gabrielson. Unreliable and Unchallenged
- Stefano Gentili,Renata Solimini, Roberta Tittarelli, Giulio Mannocchi,Francesco Paolo Busardò . A Study on the Reliability of an On-Site Oral Fluid Drug Test in a Recreational Context
. |
|
